Author Topic: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!  (Read 3218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Megan

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Hi!
   I constructed a organic molecule device which have Co chain lead , and its central region is Benzene. I calculated the IVcurve,but the calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
   I think my basic parameter settings are right. the key point is the interface action of the Co chain lead and the Benzene.
I want to know how to cantact the Co chain lead and the Benzene.
  could you please tell me that how can i fix this problem?   Thank you very much!

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2015, 08:40 »
Is the Co chain supposed to be spin-polarized? What does your script and structure look like?

Offline Megan

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2015, 09:08 »
Thanks for your reply.
I used spin in the Co chain. as you can see, I dont know how to decide the interface reasonably. Can you help me ?

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2015, 08:04 »
From chemical intuition, I see no reason why the closed-shell molecule in the image should bond to the Co chain. Are you sure all of those carbon atoms should be hydrogen-saturated?

Offline Megan

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2015, 10:10 »
this is my constructure.
first I optimized it, then I used the optimized constructure to calculate the IV curve. when i increased the voltage to 0.2V, it cant converge.
 

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5423
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2015, 04:58 »
You could try to increase the XY box to have more vacuum around the molecule, but generally this doesn't seem to be a physically relevant system...?

Offline Megan

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2015, 10:42 »
I have do it .but it  have no effect.you mean that my structure is unreasonable ?can you heip me improve it ?I use this lead because of I read a paper .

Offline Umberto Martinez

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 26
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2015, 13:32 »
your structure is indeed quite different from this last picture.
You have to rotate by 90 degrees around the x axes your molecule.

out of curiosity, can you add the full reference of that paper?

Offline Megan

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: The calculation did not converge to the requested tolerance!
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2015, 09:06 »
My structure is a single molecule spin valve .This is that paper.but,this document  is big it can not  upload.so i list the paper nameand abstract :'Bias-Controlled Giant Magnetoresistance throughCyclopentadienyl−Iron Multidecker Molecules' .'We investigated giant magnetoresistance (GMR) across cyclopentadienyl−iron multidecker molecules [Fem(C5H5)n] using thedensity functional theory and nonequilibrium Green’s function techniques.'
 The reason why this paper use Co chain lead is :'we choose Co chain leads for the purpose of reducing the computational cost. The single wire channels,although not good models of 3D substrates, deserve investigations and can be used to understand some basic
mechanisms in molecular junctions.'