« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: IV  (Read 2266 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SAKINA

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: my
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
IV
« on: August 26, 2015, 05:24 »
Hai,,

From the attachment below, the IV obtain is from defected GNR. Does the IV is consider saturate? because there is spike at bias voltage of 2.5 V above.
Logged

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: IV
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2015, 08:24 »
Why not simply re-run the calculation with bias window 0-5 eV? Then you'll know.
Logged

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5421
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: IV
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2015, 14:48 »
Simple answer is obviously "no" since it increases again after 2.5 V.
Logged

Offline SAKINA

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: my
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: IV
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2015, 08:36 »
does it consider as dual saturation or kink? because from the paper Meric this phenomena is consider as dual saturation
Logged

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5421
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: IV
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2015, 11:55 »
Uhu. Maybe.
Logged

Offline SAKINA

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: my
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: IV
« Reply #5 on: September 7, 2015, 09:21 »
thank you for the feedback.  I will run again with higher bias voltage to know the type of the trend
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »