Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Umberto Martinez

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32
436
looks like you already answered yourself! :)

the first configuration is a graphene sheet (2D periodic) and the second is a nanoribbon (1D periodic). Very different structures.

Indeed, you can have a device which is also periodic in the x and y directions.

437
Hello,
Quote
To set FE state i try to displace atoms and set small bias but geometry optimization gave me constantly different wrong results.

can you please clarify what do you mean here with "wrong results"? zero displacement?
Also how do you displace the atoms and add the small bias? (entire script maybe?)

to answer to your last question, how to setup ferroelectronic state, you can apply a small voltage and optimize as suggested in the old discussion.
In ATK you can optimize the geometry under an applied voltage. It can be a time consuming calculation though.

438
General Questions and Answers / Re: Strain after optimization
« on: March 24, 2014, 09:37 »
The matrix printed is the stress tensor, each element represents the stress acting in a particular face in a particular direction.

As zh suggested, check also the manual http://www.quantumwise.com/documents/manuals/latest/ReferenceManual/index.html/ref.stress.html

440
Gallery / Pillared Graphene
« on: March 19, 2014, 22:48 »
take a CNT and a graphene sheet and mix them together in the Builder!

for a reference see for example G. Dimitrakakis et al. Nano Lett., Vol. 8, No. 10, 2008

In different flavours!

441
1. How can I export the I-V data for Symmetrize?

By exporting/plotting -IV.biases() and -IV.currents()

2. How can I export the current values in the unit of nA? (current is exported in A)

something like:
currents = IV.currents().inUnitsOf(Ampere)*10**9

3. The energy is set to the Average Fermi level or Absolute energy in the Exported DOS data using these python script?

It depends on the energy_zero_parameter you set in the input script.
http://www.quantumwise.com/documents/manuals/latest/ReferenceManual/index.html/ref.densityofstates.html

442
did you include
IV = nlread('analysis.nc',IVCurve)[0] ?

443
try:

Code
IV = nlread('analysis.nc',IVCurve)[0]
print IV.biases(), IV.currents()

445
you can have more accurate results by increasing the mesh cut-off, changing the basis set...

or, maybe your calculation is more accurate!

446
yes, of course it is possible.
In most of the tutorials we do that :)
random example: http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/mini-tutorials/235#h6-analyzing-the-results

check also the single manual pages under "usage examples" to find useful examples.

in general you read the data with something like:
dos = nlread('dos.nc', DensityOfStates)

Finally, also note that you can export data in a text file directly from the LabFloor

447
It refers to the surface adsorption sites for your atom or molecule.

448
all the tutorials are listed in the Tutorials section of the website:
http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials
mini-, longer, builder tutorials, ecc ecc.. all you may need.
A useful link is also the Manuals page: http://quantumwise.com/manuals


You are looking for the "Estimating the memory usage for a calculation" mini-tutorial.

449
General Questions and Answers / Re: Gold Electrode-reg
« on: March 3, 2014, 08:22 »
The Au(111) surface is more stable than the (100) or the (110) surface (lower surface energy), which is true for most of the fcc metals.

However, depending on the experimental conditions or on how the surface is cleaved and so on, you can expect the (100) or the (110) surface, vicinal surfaces, reconstructed surfaces, ...
You can find references about Au(100) electrodes for example.

Of course in VNL you can chose the hkl indices by using the surface cleave plugin in the Builder and build whatever electrode you wish!

450
General Questions and Answers / Re: Geometry Optimization
« on: February 28, 2014, 15:42 »
There is nothing wrong with your calculations, the job finished because it reached all the convergence criteria you set.
In particular the maximum stress criteria of 0.01 eV/Å**3.
You can check it if you include the Stress analysis in the calculation:

Code
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Stress Report                                                                |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[  9.05881942e-03   5.25907270e-31   7.88860905e-31]                        |
|  [  7.89246091e-31   9.05881942e-03   5.25907270e-31]                        |
|  [  5.26356654e-31   6.57319890e-31   9.05881942e-03]] eV/Ang**3             |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

You should use a much lower value, something like 0.001 eV/Å**3.
See for example here this section: http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/mini-tutorials/244#h3-setting-up-the-bulk-configurations



Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32