Author Topic: charge transfer in two probe system  (Read 2092 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sweta

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
charge transfer in two probe system
« on: March 5, 2013, 13:01 »
Hi quantumwise team,

1. Can anyone tell me how to calculate and analyze charge transfer in two probe system?
2. How it compare with transmission spectra and MPSH states?

Thank you in advance!

Offline zh

  • QuantumATK Support
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Reputation: 24
    • View Profile
Re: charge transfer in two probe system
« Reply #1 on: March 7, 2013, 02:15 »
Your questions are too general. The discussions related to your question have been posted in this forum before. Please dig into them by searching "charge transfer" or "MPSH".

Offline sweta

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: charge transfer in two probe system
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2013, 09:54 »
Hello all,

I have attached mulliken population file of the two probe system at 0V and 1V. I want to analyse charge transfer vs applied bias characteristics through this data. How i can do that?

Please help!

 

Offline sweta

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: charge transfer in two probe system
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2013, 14:31 »
Dear all,

Please suggest me some article or any other link to calculate charge transfer through mulliken population.

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5428
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: charge transfer in two probe system
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2013, 14:55 »
There are a few, you can search http://quantumwise.com/documents/ATK_Publication_List.html

But some a bit older suggestions are

IEEE Electron Device Letters, 29, 746-749 (2008)
IEEE Electron Device Letters, 30, 963-965 (2009)