Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Umberto Martinez

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 32
46
Also, be careful with the oscillations in the surface energy you will observe as a function of the number of layers.
Here a detailed methodology is described for vicinal tio2 surfaces http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4840515

47
General Questions and Answers / Re: LOCPOT 1D projector bug
« on: March 10, 2016, 16:07 »
Thanks for reporting the issue, we are aware of it and we will fix it as soon as possible.
This is only present for non-polarized calculations.
We'll keep you posted as soon as this is fixed.

48
That is a very very old piece of code. It won't work in ATK 2015.
An updated example for optimizing MoS2 monolayer is described here: http://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/vibrational_modes.html

49
General Questions and Answers / Re: NEB path
« on: January 30, 2016, 11:49 »
can  you check the individual log files neb_image.0, neb_image.1, ....
It can be that one of the parallel taks failed, perhaps because of a license issue.

51
About the license, it seems that your license server stopped running.
please port output of

lmxendutil -licstat


52
General Questions and Answers / Re: Effective mass analyzer
« on: January 4, 2016, 12:32 »
The Custom Analyzer plugins have been dismissed in VNL/ATK 2015 since the corresponding analysis are now well integrated build in analysis objects.
here is described how to use the new effective mass analysis http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/item/500-effective-mass-of-electrons-in-silicon
Unfortunately, it does not show the fitting curve.

53
plot the WF against vacuum spacer anche check for convergence, for example.
in ATK (LCAO method) 10 Å should be enough.

It is also a good idea to plot the effective potential along the direction perpendicular to your surfaces.
See here for more details: http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/item/519-tuning-the-work-function-of-silver-by-deposition-of-ultrathin-oxide-layers

54
You used a different basis set.
You should use the Cerda.graphite and Hoffmann for Carbon and Hydrogen respectively:
Code
basis_set = [
    HoffmannHuckelParameters.Hydrogen_Basis,
    CerdaHuckelParameters.Carbon_graphite_Basis,
    ]

55
Hi Dominique,
can you provide the LOCPOT and OUTCAR files which gives you the 2.2 eV work function with VNL?
if they are confidential you can send an email to support@quantumwise.com.
thanks!
Umberto

56
General Questions and Answers / Re: Size of the Dense Matrices
« on: December 14, 2015, 13:35 »
There are several tutorials that describe the dynamical matrix and how the number of displacements is defined.
http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/itemlist/category/94-phonons-and-thermal-properties


57
your structure is indeed quite different from this last picture.
You have to rotate by 90 degrees around the x axes your molecule.

out of curiosity, can you add the full reference of that paper?

58
can you please provide input/output files?

Also note that 2015.1 has been released: http://quantumwise.com/products/download

59
For both questions the answer is to test your set up according to your assumptions.
Here is a relevant tutorial: http://quantumwise.com/documents/tutorials/latest/InAsDevice/index.html/

60
General Questions and Answers / Re: NiGe PDOS
« on: December 14, 2015, 10:46 »
Please attach your full input script for more detailed comments.
1)  yes and no. complete and good basis set should give similar results. did you optimized  the structure in both cases?
for Ge I would compare lower states, which are not reported in your reference. As you can see these states are very low and quite "noisy" around the Fermi level.
2) not sure if it wise :) it for sure fine to do that.
3) ??? 3d.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 32