QuantumATK Forum

QuantumATK => Scripts, Tutorials and Applications => Topic started by: Nordland on December 31, 2008, 01:19

Title: Understand Molecular junctions better.
Post by: Nordland on December 31, 2008, 01:19
Hey everyone.

Apart from Magneto-tunnel junctions, the thing I have spent most of my time modeling is molecular junctions,
and I have build some NL scripts for understanding these better, and try to enable me to speed up the process
of selecting the molecules for creating the molecular junction with the correct properties, and understand how to customize
the molecules to have the properties that I desire.
The idea is too limit the number of twoprobe calculations since they take alot of time, but you can't not leave them out for good.

For this I have written alot of code, and it is a big mesh, but I have tried to clean up in it and I thought I wanted to share the process
with you guys, if you have interest in molecular junctions.

Approach:

Tomorrow I will post scripts and a example of the usages of these scripts.
Title: Re: Understand Molecular junctions better.
Post by: Nordland on December 31, 2008, 02:07
In order to illustrate how to use this script I have done a little case study of a benzene molecule attached with two sulfur atoms
as bridge in Li-wire. This will be my sample system.


When looking at the transmission spectrum we can see that the molecular junction stops all the incomming electrons until they have an energy of rougly 2.9 eV.
The exact energy of this transition state is shifted slighly due to the interacting with the wire, however it is remarkable close. Judging from the joint density of states,
we should have a lot more transmission in the area between 3-6 eV, however the susceptibility shows that these transitions are very unlikely due to the symmetry of the eigenstates/orbitals.
Therefore we know, that if we want to have transmission in the domain from 3-6 eV we need to break the symmetry of these eigenstates, and we can then make a better device. How to break this symmetry is another story, but the idea is to add another chemical group.

Have I lost you or is it plain speak? :)