QuantumATK Forum
QuantumATK => General Questions and Answers => Topic started by: abc123def on November 10, 2015, 13:56
-
I am trying to optimize the shape and size for bcc Fe. In the basis set, I am using spin polarized Tight Tier 1 basis set with FHI (Z=8) pseudopotential. Do I need to turn on the Hubbard U for energy minimization/geometry optimization? If yes, should I use onsite mode or dual mode?
-
I have 2 comments for this:
1) No, you should not use a Hubbard U for geometry optimization. The +U method is in general not intended for first principles forces.
2) The Tight Tier 1 basis has a very large cutoff radius, which can be computationally intense. I suggest you use the DZP basis for the FHI pseudopotential, at least for an initial geometry optimization. Should be much faster.
-
Jess Wellendorff: Thank you. Can you please explain when we need to include +U in general?
-
There are probably many different attitudes towards that question, but the +U method provides in general a pertubation to the electronic eigenvalue spectrum (hence: modified band structures), and is sometimes also useful for energetics, e.g. transition-metal oxide formation energies. But no forces from the +U term are available, so it cannot be used for geometry optimization...
-
Update: It looks like you can actually use the Hubbard U for relaxing forces and stress with ATK-DFT. Sorry for the confusion.
-
Thanks again !