Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pervanem

Pages: [1] 2
2
I perform NEGF calculation for substituted (-CH3) graphene nanoribbon.
But I get converge issue?
I made maximum step=1000. I also get "the calculation di not converge to the requested tolerance" warning.
I think, this should be the last solution.  it has not been solved, yet.
 then,
https://docs.quantumatk.com/technicalnotes/negf_convergence_guide/negf_convergence_guide.html
I read above linked page.

K points= 1x1x150
mesh cut-off=150
is there an easy solution?

can you help me?



3
thank you for reply...:)

4
Hello,
I will perform NEGF calculation for graphene nanoribbon.
https://docs.quantumatk.com/tutorials/graphene_nanoribbon_device/graphene_nanoribbon_device.html

I could not  get a validated electrode message in validator electrode section...

Can you help me?
thanks....

5
Hi,
NEGF calculations, I try to prepare the molecular junctions.
But I could not align sulfur atoms.
This operation was easy on older versions of ATK (as 2016, 2017).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoErF-WpU0c&t=405s

it was very difficult in QuantumATK2018.06.

Can you help me?
thanks...

6
Hello,
I perform the NEGF calculation with 1 core.
the calculation expires more than a week. (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 v)
when electricity is cut off, the calculation is not completed.
Finally, the account was left half at 1.6 V.
again, I need to make a calculation from the beginning?
Can I continue the account from 1.6 V value.
Can you help me?

7
OK...thank you your reply....

8
I installed latest QATK program (2018.06 sp1-1). but I can not see plane-wave calculator? why?
Can you help me?
Thanks

9
General Questions and Answers / Re: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« on: September 21, 2018, 14:23 »
continued2

10
General Questions and Answers / Re: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« on: September 21, 2018, 14:23 »
continued

11
General Questions and Answers / 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« on: September 21, 2018, 14:20 »
Hello,
I performed the NEGF calculation (IV-Characteristics)  and transmisionspectrum....
But results are different from each other...default settings are almost same 2018.06 with 2016.4..
Why? which is more accurate?
Can you help me?
 related pictures was attached.

12
thank you your reply...
I noticed the temperature change or other settings...
yes.. in this case,  the account will be more cost and more accurate...

13
I performed as shown in picture..(for 2018.06)

Note: in 2016.4, there is not transmission spectrum calculation (for device cu).

14
I deleted part of the file (due to max 400kb limit)

15
contiuned...files..

Pages: [1] 2