Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - hzkvictory

Pages: [1]
1
Using ATK 2019, I am testing the behaviour of Single electron transistor as per Benzene Single-Electron Transistor Tutorial Version 2015.2. The script went well in old versions of ATK (such as ATK 12.8.2).

However, there is a problem in running the script fig4-1plot.py which uses readTotalEnergy.py to get calculated total energy at  different gate voltages in the new version of ATK.
In version 2019, though the energy has been sucessfully calculated, the error occured, reporting "ValueError: No total energy in hdf5 file".

Please help solving the issue for reading the data sucessfully.

Thank you very much.

PS: relevent files of *.hdf5 and *.py are attached in the zip file.

2
   I am repeating the example shown in "Properties of an isolated benzene molecule" and I have some questions.

   When using the multipole boundary condition, is the periodic superscell (in which there are periodic images of the benzene molecule) approach used or just a single isolated box (in which there is only one benzene molecule) is used?         
   In this specific example of a charged benzene, the size of the box is not explilcitly given. I would like to know very much the size of the box containing the charged benzene. Can I find the size of the box in the output file?
   I would also like to know, if I calculate a different charged molecule, how can I know the size of the box that is actually used.

   I found a paper about the multipole expansion solution to solve the Poisson's equation
(http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.4495). I would like to ask you if the method described in this paper is relevant to the multipole method used in ATK.

Thank you for your prompt reply.

3
Could you show the reference for multipole boundary condition. It seems the multipole boundary condition is used to simulate isolated systems, but in molecule configuration, why a default "supercell" is used?

4
When an extra electron is added to molecule, the molecule get charged.
In Siesta, when extra electron is added, the default cell is filled with jellium-like opposite charge for compensation, so the total box is neutral. In order to remove the interaction of charged default cells, a Madelung correction term is applied to the energy to make it converge much faster with cell size.
( for molecules or atoms, this is done only if the cell is SC, FCC or BCC).
However, in the forum I haven't found how ATK remove the effect of extra compensate electron on repeated default cells in calculation ,
I don't know whether ATK use the same method as Siesta ?
In addition, how is the default cell for molecule in molecule_configuration like, especially when molecule is being charged (like SC)?

urgent, please reply soon as possible.

5
Local Device Density of States is avialable in device_configuartion.
But when it comes to molecule_configuration and bulk_configuration, LDOS is not acessible.
how to get the LDOS (the partical charge density at fixed energy)of a single molecule ?

6
In order to visualize electron density in Vesta, electron density was export in *.cub file.
When related molecule configuration was export in *.cif or *. xyz file, it did not fit the *.cub file.
the combination of electron density and molecule configuration are well in Virtual Nanolab as follow

But in Vesta, I get only this


How to deal with it?

7
ATK calculate bandstructure and plot it along high-symmetry lines.
when I need to plot 3D dirac cones, I am despaired, because i can't do it.
how to extract data from the *.nc and plot the dirac cone of graphene unit ?
attched is the plot i want

8
   I found the gatevoltage dose not work in bulk configuration, when I do transmission, dos and bandstructure calculations under different gate voltages.
   My configuration is similar with the one in minitoturial(
Transmission spectrum of perfect sheets of graphene and MoS2 in speturm
http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/mini-tutorials/167),but mine have dielect region and metallic region under graphene.
   dose gate voltage work in bulk configuration? or I did something wrong

Moderator edit: Fixed spelling mistake in subject

9
I dont know how to insert image(in my computer not on the net).
so I have to attach the conductance--gate voltage plot in experiments independedly.
and this is a related paper for reference: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038109808001178


I do not know what mistake I have made in the calculation,
I guess maybe it is a rather physical problem: the conductance in experiments is conceptually different with the one in ATK?
 
hope to attract more discussion and help me solve the problem.

10
zigzag-edged graphene.
attached is the related documents:first,conductance--gatevoltage[-8.0,8.0V]every0.25Va point.
                                                    second,conductance--gatevoltage[-0.1,0.1V]every0.02Va point(in order to make sure the problem is not caused by small density of gatevoltage).
                                                     third,script to calculate the transmission
                                                     forth,gatescan script

11
armchair graphene
                                                    first,conductance--gatevoltage[-8.0,8.0V]every0.25V a point.
                                                    second,transmission spectrum under +8.0V gate voltage.(different with other gate voltage)
                                                     third,script to calculate the transmission
                                                     forth,gatescan script

12
Graphene was widely studied both on theory and experiments. Most basic experiment properties have been tested by simulations.
   I noticed that conductance-gate voltage is very common in experiments, but little simulation by ATK is researched. So I do a lot of work on it.
   However, the result are in contradict with the experiment results.

In experiments, resistance--gate voltage have almost the same trend as following
I did three series of calculations, bulk graphene, armchair-edged graphene, zigzag-edged graphene.

 bulk graphene
attached is the related documents:first,conductance--gatevoltage[-1.0,1.0V]every0.1Va point.
                                                    second,transmission spectrum under all gate voltage.(interesting to find the gate voltage do not affect bulk graphene)
                                                     third,script to calculate the transmission
                                                     forth,gatescan script

13
http://quantumwise.com/publications/tutorials/mini-tutorials/167
shows the way to calculate the transmission of grpahene_bulk.
   my question is: when a gate voltage is applied to the graphene sheet, ie, in the spatial region define metallic region and dielectric region, what kind of multi-grid in Poission Solver should be choosen?
   In fact, I have done many on the calculations  to get the right choice, but failed.
Attached are the scripts.

Pages: [1]