Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AsifShah

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
31
General Questions and Answers / Re: M3GNET
« on: December 29, 2023, 13:23 »
Dear QATK team,

Please respond to this question.

Thanks
regards

32
hi,
Yes but you will have to run some code or else you can extract each configuration from trajectory and calculate mulliken charge.

Btw why is that required? Some of the images might have high forces/stresses and might not be of use?
Are you trying to track how Mulliken charge changes with steps?

33
General Questions and Answers / Re: IV points convergence problem
« on: December 19, 2023, 13:37 »
Hi,

Try changing parameters in iteration settings in LCAO device calculator or
Say suppose 0.1 is not converging use 0.11 or 0.15 instead.

34
General Questions and Answers / M3GNET
« on: December 19, 2023, 13:35 »
Dear Admin,

How to access M3GNET in new QATK release V2023.12
I tried using forcefield block but it does not show M3GNET there?

35
I will write here steps to follow:
1. Choose Silver from database.
2. Search Surface (Cleave) in the right section of builder. Click on cleave and write 111 for miller indices and then keep hitting Next till end.
3. At last you will have a 3 atom Ag supercell.
4. Do same for copper.
5. Then bring both 3 atom cleaved Ag and Cu supercells into the interface builder and form the interface with lowest possible strain that you want.
6. Just below the drop boxes in interface builder you will see +/- buttons. Hit + to increase number of atoms on each side of Ag and Cu.
7. Make interface.
8. Go to device and there you have it.

PS: In device configuration try increasing electrode extension. Generally, metals require less screening length in electrode extension so you can keep the around 2 nm maybe, though check the electrostatic difference potential later if it converges or not (then increase it further).

36
I don't know how strain will affect your study, but I have would say a 2% strain is okay. However, I would suggest looking into the literature to see how much strain people use in similar work as that of yours.

I am guessing you are reducing strain below 1% or 0.5% which is why you have so many atoms in your system.

37
Did you mean like this as shown in the figure?

38
Got it. Thanks

39
Also, I would suggest looking into Fatbandstructure of your heterostructure.
That is a very useful tool, especially for 2D materials.

40
Just droppping note for QATK team.

No doubt ML is a very useful tool. Kindly, provide a tutorial for Defect training. That would be very helpful.

41
You can simply look into interface builder tutorial of QuantumATK.
its pretty easy to use.

42
I hope your problem is solved.
But just a question, why do u have so many atoms in your system?
You can design a smaller heterostructure of your system using interface builder that will bring down the number of atoms and time consumed.
This won't change physics if your system is pristine.

43
Yes, they are same.
Interface is used to create heterostructure.
Now depends if you are making in-plane (mostly for 2D materials) or vertical heterostructure (for 2D/3D materials).
I am guessing your system is 3D?

44
1. How many atoms do you have in your system?
2. Why arent you running calculation using MPI? Are you running it on single core?
The first screenshot looks like memory issue.

45
Dear Admin,

I am trying to make a FET with multiple spatial regions, however, the QATK keeps shutting down while I am making spatial regions on an atomistic structure. Please see the attached image for errors and kindly provide a possible solution.

Thanks

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10