Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gozde

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hello again Dr.Blom,

I try to understand how length of the electrodes affects the IV curve of the our device model. Therefore I have made some tests.

I have noticed that, when I increase the electrode extension length, minimal electrode length is also increased to be the same as the electrode extension length. However if I have first increased the size of the central region at the interface of the respective electrode, and secondly I have increased the electrode extension length, minimal electrode length remains same. What is the origin of this difference and which geometry makes sense?

I look forward to hearing from you.

2
General Questions and Answers / Re: Hamiltonian Derivatives
« on: June 20, 2023, 11:24 »
Hello again,
Hamiltonian derivatives calculation has been completed by increasing atomic displacement from 0.01 Ang to 0.1 Ang. I know that Hamiltonian derivatives is calculated via finite difference method, so increasing the default value of atomic displacement gives the wrong result?

3
Thank you Dr. Blom, I got it.

4
Hi all,

My results obtained from transport calculations vary with electrode size. The results I obtained when the minimum electrode size is one unit cell i.e. 3.7 ang and the electron extension is two unit cells i.e. 7.4 ang (QATK default) are quite different from when the minimum electrode size is two unit cells i.e. 7.4 ang and the electrode extension size is two units cells, i.e. 7.4 ang. I wonder, which parameter do we need to change in order to obtain accurate results? Is it the electrode size or the electrode extension size?

5
Can you suggest any recipe to overcome this problem?

6
Actually the main problem arises when qatk performing the Fermi level calculation. This first task, unfortunately is not over. You can find the log files at the attachmenet.

7
General Questions and Answers / Hamiltonian Derivatives
« on: April 14, 2023, 10:59 »
Hello,
I succeed to obtain hamiltonian derivatives for structures which have unitcell composed of 2, 3 and 4 atoms. However, executation tasks do not progress even one step in unitcell containing 24 atoms. I heva used thight parameters to obtain phonon dispersion accurately and I achieved. I guess this problem can be originated from high accuracy of the parameters of the LCAO calculator because I use, analysis from file (optimized bulk structure) before the study objects. Unfortunately executation task stays on the same step 1/73 for hours and does not progress.
Do you have any suggestion to make progress?

8
General Questions and Answers / Re: ExternalPotential
« on: April 14, 2023, 10:36 »
Dr. Blom, sorry to take your time, I think I phrased it wrong. What I mean is that when we dope electrodes, compensation charges are automatically added to the both electrodes and the central region, with the same amount and type of doping by the algorithm. We shouldn't change these compensation charges, right?

9
General Questions and Answers / Re: ExternalPotential
« on: April 10, 2023, 12:37 »
Thank you Dr. Blom. As far as I understand, we should not change the charge added by the algorithm to left/right eletrode as well as central region to compensate for the doping. Am I right?

10
General Questions and Answers / ExternalPotential
« on: April 3, 2023, 23:29 »
Hi All,

When we dope only the electrodes, why is the same type and amount of compensation charge has added to electrodes and central region as an external potential? Is this necessary to neutralize the system? The second question is, If we want to dope the electrodes with the same type and amount of charge and remain the central region undoped, should this part of the script be as follows?  And the last question, if we change the type or amount of the compensation charge manually which is added to central region as an external potential, how the results are affected, i.e. IVCurve?

I'm looking forward to your reply.

Code
# Add external potential
external_potential = AtomicCompensationCharge([
    ('doping_0', 0.01),
    ('doping_1', 0.01)
    ])

left_electrode.setExternalPotential(external_potential)

# Add external potential
external_potential = AtomicCompensationCharge([
    ('doping_0', 0.01),
    ('doping_1', 0.01)
    ])

right_electrode.setExternalPotential(external_potential)

# Add external potential
external_potential = AtomicCompensationCharge([
    ('doping_0', 0.01),
    ('doping_1', 0.01)
    ])

central_region.setExternalPotential(external_potential)

# Add tags
device_configuration.addTags('doping_0', [ 0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12,
                                          13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23])
device_configuration.addTags('doping_1', [48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60,
                                          61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71])

11
General Questions and Answers / Re: Oscillations in EDP
« on: February 1, 2023, 16:19 »
Thank you Dr.Blom.

12
Thank you for your comments. I will go back to tutorial and make the calculations again under the guidance of your advice.

13
General Questions and Answers / Re: Oscillations in EDP
« on: January 18, 2023, 13:00 »
Any comment?

14
General Questions and Answers / Re: error in PDOS calculation
« on: December 8, 2022, 13:54 »
Hi,

Have you tried spin=Spin.Up with capital U instead of spin=Spin.up ?

15
General Questions and Answers / Oscillations in EDP
« on: December 8, 2022, 09:55 »
Hi everyone,

I have studied on 5 nm 2D pn junction (doped with 0.005 e/atom) and I have obtained EDP as in figure. What can be the origin of these oscillations? Could these oscillations be due to short length of device size or low doping amount? In addition, EDP should become flat close to the electrodes, right?

Best regards.

Pages: [1] 2