Author Topic: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway  (Read 6148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« on: December 5, 2018, 13:25 »

Hello,

How can we plot 'Relative Energy' vs. 'Reaction Pathway' using ATK? Do you have any tutorial available ?

Best_
Dipankar Saha

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #1 on: December 5, 2018, 14:14 »
Sounds like you want the NEB method? We have several tutorials, this one is probably the best introduction: https://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/neb_pt/neb_pt.html

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #2 on: December 5, 2018, 14:21 »
Okay... Thank you Ulrik !

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2018, 09:55 »
1) Can it show the activation barrier during any surface-site reaction ?
2) How to deduce the thermodynamical (/or, kinetic) stability  of such reactions?

Best_
Dipankar

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2018, 12:13 »
1) Yes, the NEB methodology can find the energy barrier for any process that is contingent on one or more atoms moving in a constrained way from one stable state to another. It is usually the method of choice for finding energy barriers during chemical reactions. For more details, I suggest you consult the original references.

1) + 2) In general, simple energy considerations work well, but usually it is also necessary to include other contributions to the free energy. For more information, I will suggest you study the work of e.g. H. Jonsson, J. K. Nørskov, K. Reuter, M. Neurock and others.

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2018, 10:27 »
NEB methodology can find the energy barrier for any process that is contingent on one or more atoms moving in a constrained way from one stable state to another.

1) Do you employ the harmonic approximation to TST (transition state theory) ?
How the entropic effects are included?

2) What is a 'dividing surface'?
 
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 11:07 by Dipankar Saha »

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2018, 11:04 »
1) Yes, in the HTST object: https://docs.quantumwise.com/manual/Types/HTSTEvent/HTSTEvent.html

2) It is the surface that divides the product and reactant states from each other, and in principle transitions between the two states can happen at any point on it. However, it is (almost) never used in practice, as there usually is a saddle point where the energy is lowest and which will then dominate the rate.

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Relative Energy vs. Reaction Pathway
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2018, 11:09 »
Okay, I understand... :)

Thank you for all the information !!

Best_
Dipankar
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 11:13 by Dipankar Saha »