There is logic in the madness, but I agree something is not completely right. Let me first check, is this a spin polarized or unpolarized calculation?
What you see is that the real part differs not by 1 but by 0.5, or more specifically,
eps_r = susc_r/2 + 0.5
eps_i = susc_i/2
Thus what we seem to have is eps = 0.5+susc/2, which gives an indication of what is wrong.
I'm relatively sure the suscpetibility is correct (because that is what we actually calculate), with the small (big!) reservation that perhaps it's wrong by x2 in which case eps is actually correct... We will investigate and let you know asap.