Author Topic: van der waals correction  (Read 11487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MaryamNazirfakhr

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #15 on: December 8, 2015, 22:06 »
thank you very much

I have used your recommended scripter for optimization, but an error appears (as you can see in http://8pic.ir/images/59quqyrfa1w2gyll8e3f.png) and simulation stops! There is a comment at the end of the log file: "Back Engine Exception : Diagonalization error, overlap matrix not positive definite. This may be caused by atoms that are too close to each other or situated in equivalent positions, or a too low value of interaction_max_range. Check the configuration, basis set and/or try to increase the interaction_max_range."

I have incresed the "interaction max range" up to 100 Ang , but still this error appears! What's wrong with it? What should I do?  :'( should I change the lattice parameters or the initial interlayer distance?
The project file is here for you (to see the bilayer structure, if needed)!
« Last Edit: December 8, 2015, 22:08 by MaryamNazirfakhr »

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5565
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 93
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #16 on: December 8, 2015, 23:15 »
Very simple, you have 2 atoms on top of each other, everywhere in the structure. Look at the error message, and pick the first and easiest option to troubleshoot - use the "Close neighbors" tools in the Builder to find atoms that are close to each other.
« Last Edit: December 8, 2015, 23:17 by Anders Blom »

Offline MaryamNazirfakhr

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #17 on: December 9, 2015, 00:57 »
unfortunatly online troubleshoot does not work!!
Could you please explain a little more about "close neighbors"? It deletes some of the atoms, so the structure will be destroyed!

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5565
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 93
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #18 on: December 9, 2015, 05:30 »
1. Post Python scripts, not project.ini, it's difficult to get the structure out of there.
2. At least in the structure you called "Billayer 12-BNNR , before opt", all or almost all atoms are duplicated, so that will of course not work. Yes the tool will delete some atoms - those that are on top of each other. This will not destroy the structure, it will fix it.


Offline MaryamNazirfakhr

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #19 on: December 9, 2015, 07:43 »
I have attached the scripter for you.
I have optimized the single layer BNNR unit cell with LDA, and then created the bilayer unitccell with merge tool.  finally I ran the bilayer  unitcell optimization with  recommended D3 scriper. till now there is no warning!
 
but in the attached scripter the single layers are opemized with GGA. and when i  I run the bilayer  unitcell optimization with  recommended D3 scriper, that error appear. what's wrong?

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #20 on: December 9, 2015, 09:18 »
You should read such errors closely. Often they actually tell you exactly what the problem is:
** Back Engine Exception : Diagonalization error, overlap matrix not positive definite. This may be caused by atoms that are too close to each other or situated in equivalent positions, or a too low value of interaction_max_range. Check the configuration, basis set and/or try to increase the interaction_max_range.
** Location of Exception : eigensolutions.cpp:2091


In this case, you have somehow managed to overlay 3 duplicates of the structure, so in all atomic positions you have three identical atoms. That's the problem causing the error. You should only have 14x2=28 atoms in the cell, but you have 84...

Offline MaryamNazirfakhr

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 26
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: van der waals correction
« Reply #21 on: December 9, 2015, 22:43 »
Thanks for your patience dear!   :)

I have tested your recommended D3 scripter by optimizing a bilayer 12-ZGNR unitcell (http://8pic.ir/images/xhj6q24la202bjxwsu6x.png).
For "OptimizeGeometry" I have also used this settings => force=0.05 , stress=0.05, method=LBFGS , constrain: unchecked just Z.
As you can see the result of optimization in "http://8pic.ir/images/gein7f25if6nr29g4t1f.png", layers are somehow bended! Is that correct?

I would like to repeat this simulation for BNNR. Since this type of simulations (DFT+D3) take too much time, I would like to be sure about the settings and checking for my probable mistakes  ;)

One more question! Is it possible to use D2 instead of D3?

Regards
« Last Edit: December 9, 2015, 22:51 by MaryamNazirfakhr »