Author Topic: Conductance as a function of gate potential .py sample  (Read 2381 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eli

  • New QuantumATK user
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Hello Everybody,
I have a problem with a ready sample in the Quantomwise tutorials.
In the below link and attached file, there is a py file for generating Conductance as a function of gate potential for a transistor.
http://docs.quantumwise.com/_downloads/conductance_diff_gate.py
But when I try to run it in my VNL program, the below error has stopped my analyzing.
 File "c:\users\hosein\appdata\local\temp\3510482093326138.py", line 19, in <module>
    object_id="trans"+str(gate_voltage_list[n]))[0]
IndexError: list index out of range
NanoLanguageScript execution failure


So, Please if someone has an idea, I would be appreciated to help me.

Offline Petr Khomyakov

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 25
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance as a function of gate potential .py sample
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2016, 00:41 »
I have checked the script. It works for me. What version of VNL-ATK are you using?

Offline Eli

  • New QuantumATK user
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance as a function of gate potential .py sample
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2016, 22:11 »
Hi
My VNL version is 11.2.
Do you think it is very old?

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5429
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Conductance as a function of gate potential .py sample
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2016, 22:45 »
Yes, it is very old, and support has expired. Almost all tutorials are written for 2014, 2015 or 2016 versions. You can maybe get it to work if you know Python a bit, and compare to the Reference Manual (included in your installation package, I think, maybe). But 11.2 is really old, even 11.8 would have been a lot different...