Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jess Wellendorff

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 63
76
General Questions and Answers / Re: dR in Plane wave calculator
« on: November 23, 2017, 10:36 »
dR is the largest value of the difference between the electron density between two SCF steps. The dR is therefore supposed to decrease during the ATK-PW SCF loop, but is not an actual SCF convergence parameter (SCF convergence is determined by the total energy difference between SCF steps).

77
- Do you want to twist both graphene layers at some angle, or just one of them?
- Which direction wrt. the monolayer plane?

78
General Questions and Answers / Re: error in ruuning trasnport job
« on: November 20, 2017, 16:02 »
The reason for the error is that 2 gold atoms are exactly on top of each other (atoms 75 and 76). You need to remove one of them. They are on the boundary to the right-hand electrode. Use the Selection Tools -> Close Neighbors to locate the Au atom to remove.

79
General Questions and Answers / Re: Gate voltage
« on: November 17, 2017, 07:55 »
We have several tutorial on this, for example https://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/silicon_nanowire/silicon_nanowire.html. Please search the online documentation (https://docs.quantumwise.com before asking questions on this Forum.

80
General Questions and Answers / Re: optimize geometry
« on: November 15, 2017, 11:04 »
The choice of pseudopotentials+basis set depends in general on the system under investigation. So it's often a matter of testing. Generally speaking, OMX will be better than FHI, but also computationally more demanding. And yes, once you chose a set of parameters, stick to those for subsequent band structure calculation also.

81
General Questions and Answers / Re: nano comomposite
« on: November 10, 2017, 07:17 »
Please provide some more details about what kind of configuration you would like to construct. "Nanocomposite" is too general for a useful answer.

82
In addition, the calculated chemical potential is not very meaningful in itself; you need to compare it to some other energy-quantity computed using the same pseudopotentials+basis set in order to use it.

83
There have been issues with getting a TeamViewer session up and running, but I have now received the information needed to establish the session. I will look at this today.
Kind regards,
Jess

84
General Questions and Answers / Re: Poisson solver
« on: October 31, 2017, 11:43 »
You might also have a look at this tutorial where some aspects of the choice of boundary conditions in a particular device calculation is discussed: https://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/graphene_nanoribbon_device/graphene_nanoribbon_device.html

85
1) DM is a partial trace of the density matrix, so for each atom it's basically the Mulliken population.
2) DD is then the difference between DM and the (integer) number of valence electrons in the pseudopotential. So you can use the MullikenPopulation analysis module to compute it.
3) no, such a rule does not exist in general: If it's a bulk system, the system can be nonmagnetic even though the total number of valence electrons is odd. Not so if it's a non-periodic system (a molecule); in that case you will probably need spin-polarization if the number of electrons is odd, e.g. in molecular NO.

86
1) There is a very distinct different between your *physical* computing cores, and the *MPI* processes you launch: When running an ATK job, you choose both the number of cores to use (physical cores) and the number of MPI processes to launch on those cores. It is in general highly recommended that the two numbers be identical! That is, if you launch more MPI processes than the cores you have allocated, some cores will run more than one MPI process. So yes, MPI does not stop you from overloading the physical cores with several MPI processes, which may lead to an unstable job because several MPI processes must then share the RAM available to only one physical core. It is your own responsibility to avoid this by carefully making sure the number of physical cores match the number of MPI processes. There may of course be situations where it is advantageous to run fewer MPI processes than allocated cores (e.g. to get more memory per MPI process), but this is rare.

2) Not knowing the details of your cluster setup, it's hard to know exactly how you should run your ATK jobs to get 100% performance. You mention that your cluster is composed of 2 different sets of cores (A and B). In such a situation, I would usually recommend to run an ATK job on one of those sub-systems only, i.e. run job #1 on A and job #2 on B. But again, this depends on the cluster setup. I believe we already have a support ticket on support@quantumwise.com about this, that's a better channel for discussing details of cluster setups, so I will continue on that one from here.
 

87
General Questions and Answers / Re: tunnel coupling
« on: October 30, 2017, 09:28 »
How do you define the mentioned coupling parameters?

88
General Questions and Answers / Re: Penta-graphene nanoribbon
« on: October 25, 2017, 14:47 »
Thanks very much!

89
General Questions and Answers / Re: effective potential
« on: October 25, 2017, 14:45 »
Dear Wang, the work function does in general depend on surface facet.

90
General Questions and Answers / Re: Penta-graphene nanoribbon
« on: October 18, 2017, 11:26 »
You should probably also swap a few axes to align the ribbon along C.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 63