Author Topic: Poisson solver settings for Electronic Transport Through A Distorted Nanoribbon  (Read 1869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline qweasel

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
In the video "Electronic Transport Through A Distorted Nanoribbon", the settings of the Poisson solver are kept as default (FFT, periodic boundary conditions).

Why is that? If it's a ribbon, wouldn't more suitable boundary conditions be non-periodic?

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5429
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Sure, but that's actually the default for devices (Dirichlet in the transport direction).

Offline qweasel

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
In the transport direction it is indeed Dirichlet. I was referring to the top/bottom direction. Why keep it as periodic in the case of a nanoribbon?

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5429
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Why not? FFT is a lot faster than the alternatives, and as long as you have enough vacuum, any boundary condition works just as fine. Of course, if you actually have a gate in any direction, then it changes, but forcing the field to be zero if the vacuum is not large enough (and no gate present) is actually more wrong than a periodic solution which at least would have zero derivative at the edge of the cell (ok, so would Neumann, but you can only place that on one side or else it's equivalent to periodic :) ). So in short, FFT is the default basically because it's not wrong, and faster.