Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - iconxicon

Pages: [1]
1
Thank you, Daniele, learned a lot! ;D

2
THX for the reply
<1.py >corresponds with the pic I posted previous, <2.py> is a different but similar system with <1.py> except for the centre region (more layer to make sure it's a insulator), I calculated 2.py and found contradiction with other published research using ATK (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044008).

As you can see in <fig 2_pic.png> current is  1.05nA under the bias of 0.4 V, which I think is amazingly high (up 0.1496nA;down 0.900nA) consider around 0eV both up and down component's transmission is very low (magnified spectrum in <fig2_pic_mag.png>). And this contradicts with the paper I mentioned above whose transmission is higher than me but current lower.

3
I have done a calculation on a  2 dimensional system with ATK to study it's spin-dependent transport properties. However after the transmission spectrum was generated, I can not calculate the transmission eigenvalue in one of the transmission "peak", let along eigenstates. (The "peak"s transmission is about 0.15. )

After I tried to calculate the eigenvalue in VNL, I tried to use script, and ended up with the following sentence
"Number of transmission modes = 0"

Since I have obtained a rather big transmission coefficient, I think no transmission channel in this system is rather strange.

BTW, I have also calculated the same system under bias and the current is bigger (*10) than some other published research, although the transmission is about 3 orders below.

Can any one help please?

Pages: [1]