Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jhwang

Pages: [1]
1
I want to do some quantitative analysis, if the overlap matrix can be obtained too, it's better.

2
Thank you for your clarification!
I have plot the wavefunction by the array returned back, and it is identical to the reported results.

3
Here is the NanoLanguage script I used

import numpy

projected_hamiltonian_eigenstates = calculateProjectedHamiltonianEigenstates(
    self_consistent_calculation = scf,
    projection_atoms = (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103),
    quantum_numbers = (176)
)
for projected_hamiltonian_eigenstates_index,state in enumerate(projected_hamiltonian_eigenstates):
    label = 'Projected Hamiltonian Eigenstates'+' '+str(projected_hamiltonian_eigenstates_index)
    if processIsMaster(): file.addToSample(state, 'twoprobe_configuration', label)
    print projected_hamiltonian_eigenstates_index
    array1 = state.toArray()
    unit1  = state.toUnit()
    print unit1
    print array1.shape
    print array1[0][0][0]
    print state.quantumNumber()
    print state.eigenvalue()

4
Dear all:
When I use calculateProjectedHamiltonianEigenstates() to perform the MPSH calculation, I found the array returned by toArray() is not a complex but a float number array, which is contradictory to the manual "Array toArray(): Returns the real-space representation of the cell-function (i.e. the periodic part of the eigenstate) as complex numbers in a NumPy array with dimensions (n1, n2, n3)."
(http://www.quantumwise.com/documents/manuals/ATK-2008.10/ref.calculateprojectedhamiltonianeigenstates.html)
Can anyone help me for this ? Thanks very much.

5
Dear all users:
I encountered with one quesition when I performed MPSH calculations
I projected the Hamiltonian to the scattering region with 80 C and 24 H atoms, which means that there are 344 valence electrons in total.
However, when I check the MPSH energy spectrum I found 176 orbitals with negative energy, which means that there are 352 valence electrons under Fermi level, and it is contradictory to the previous total number of 344 electrons in the scattering region.
Is the equivalent atoms in the electrode was accounted into the MPSH calculation? or other reasons?

Pages: [1]