Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hasan Sahin

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Hello,

I plot HOMO and LUMO levels within VNL. Different options of VNL such as sign, magnitude and value yield same isosurface (only the color format is changed). Why are they same, what is the definition ? What do we visualize in vnl ?

2
How the vacuum level can be calculated by using ATK ?  Is there any command or script for this job ?

3
Do we have to use metallic electrodes during ATK calculations? Does the theory used by ATK have objection to semiconducting electrodes ? Thanks to shifts in levels due to changing bias, can't we calculate any current throught the molecular device at some voltage values.

5
Hello, I use the script given in ATK tutorial but it works only for unpolarized systems. How I must modify it to get up and down spin transmissions.

The script is :

from ATK.TwoProbe import *
from ATK.MPI import processIsMaster

old_scf_zero_bias = \
    restoreSelfConsistentCalculation("bare.nc")

temporary_list = range(-50,50,1)
energy_list = []
for i in temporary_list:
    energy_list.append(i/10.0)

trans_spectrum = calculateTransmissionSpectrum(
       old_scf_zero_bias,
       energies = energy_list*electronVolt
       )

trans_energy = trans_spectrum.energies()
trans_coeff = trans_spectrum.coefficients()
trans_energy = trans_energy.tolist()
trans_energy.reverse()
trans_coeff = trans_coeff.tolist()
trans_coeff.reverse()

while len(trans_energy)>0:
    if processIsMaster(): print trans_energy.pop(),'\t',trans_coeff.pop()

6
It is ok now... following script works :)


from ATK.MPI import processIsMaster

import numpy


for i in numpy.arange(0.00, 1.01, 0.01):
   
    energy=calculateTotalEnergy(restoreSelfConsistentCalculation("21-%.2f.nc" % i)).inUnitsOf(eV)   
    if processIsMaster(): print 'TOTALENERGY', i, energy

7
BAD NEWS...

scf = restoreSelfConsistentCalculation("a%g.nc" % i)
NLValueError: Invalid NetCDFFile.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 12, in ?
NLValueError: Invalid NetCDFFile.

8
Thank you for your time Anders...

9
Hello,

I want to read datas from nc files named as ,for example,  a1.5.nc, a1.6.nc, a1.7.nc, a1.8.nc, a1.9.nc,

How can I restore these scf calcualtions for reading datas with float command.

10
General Questions and Answers / How to get net electron density ?
« on: September 29, 2009, 15:17 »
How can I get net electron density (ChargeUP-ChargeDOWN) and store it as a VNL file ?

11
ATK uses the charge density of previous calculation. If you choose smaller voltage steps such as 0.01 volt, better convergence may be provided.

12
General Questions and Answers / Re: Smearing the I-V curve
« on: April 30, 2009, 15:59 »
After a lot of test calculations (and your useful advices), I am happy to announce that

Number of points is the most effective paramater to get reasonable I-V curves

Additionally, Electron temperature must be taken in the range of room temperature.

13
General Questions and Answers / Re: Smearing the I-V curve
« on: April 27, 2009, 13:53 »
If the transmission spectrum is zero then the current will be zero :)

But I guess T(E) is not exactly zero, just very small. In that case, I guess the current integration can have a large effect on the results. Can you post an example of the transmission spectrum, at two different biases? Perhaps in log-scale.


If transmission coefficient is zero at a certain energy value it has no contribution to the current (here we are agree) but current does not have to be zero (it may has a finite value due to previous transmission contributions ).
I attached transmission spectrum for up and down at zero bias ( for finite bias, negligible changes occur and we have almost same transmissison spectra)

I am sorry, I have no log-scale transmission.

As you see, there is only one peak (around fermi level) for up and down transmission, and I-V curves (see previos message) need to be corrected...

14
General Questions and Answers / Re: Smearing the I-V curve
« on: April 27, 2009, 11:43 »
black and red curves correspond to UP and DOWN spin current.  I said that they are strange because there are peaks and dips in I-V curve while corresponding transmission spectra has zero transmission coefficients.

15
General Questions and Answers / Re: Smearing the I-V curve
« on: April 27, 2009, 11:15 »
bad news...  I have been tried various parameter sets as follows.

green_function_INFINITESIMAL === e-5, e-9
TEMPERATURE  === 600, 300 and 5 Kelvin
TOLERANCE      === e-5 and e-8

My I-V calculation still has strange peaks (as can be seen in attached figures)
What are the  paramaters directly affect I-V values.

Pages: [1] 2 3