Author Topic: Is this a proper Ni-Graphene-Ni MTJ model?  (Read 2451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grasim

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Is this a proper Ni-Graphene-Ni MTJ model?
« on: March 4, 2013, 15:47 »
Dear Blom,

Many thanks for your answer to my prior questions, now I set up an improved model for my study as the attachment. This configration includes two gate in A and remains periodic in B. Is this geometry expected to get a right results?

Additionally, with this configration can I use periodic boundary conditions for the Poisson solver? Or I have to use Neumann boundary for both A and B?

Thanks for your time, best regards.

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 96
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Is this a proper Ni-Graphene-Ni MTJ model?
« Reply #1 on: March 4, 2013, 16:28 »
Yes, this is a reasonable structure from a computational perspective at least.

Please use PNG files for images, then they can be seen in the browser (and the file size is generally smaller).