Author Topic: TB09 meta-GGA  (Read 3456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
TB09 meta-GGA
« on: November 25, 2015, 20:25 »
WARNING  :-                                                                                                                             
The computed TB09 meta-GGA exchange-correlation potential                 
diverged in   0.03 % of the simulation volume, and was                       
 truncated to be in the range [-10.0000,  10.0000] Hartree
___________________
What does it signify ??

Thanks in advance..... :)

Best_
Dipankar

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: TB09 meta-GGA
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2015, 10:23 »
It signifies a very minor numerical inaccuracy in evaluating the TB09 exchange potential in some particular and very small region of the simulation cell. No need to worry. This can happen in regions of small density/high density gradients, which is usually in vacuum regions. But again, 0.03% does not signify a real problem, so just keep going :)

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: TB09 meta-GGA
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2015, 13:30 »
Thanks a lot for the reply...!! :)

Regards_
Dipankar

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5541
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 91
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: TB09 meta-GGA
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2015, 23:13 »
So, you have vacuum in the cell... In general, it will not work to determine "c" self-consistently then; instead, you will need to fix "c", and perhaps fit its value based on a reference band gap or whatever.

The warning comes from the fact that one term in MGGA diverges if the density (or rather, it's gradient) goes to zero. So while 0.03% is not a lot, it's actually more complicated than that. Note that it says the potential "diverged in 0.03 % of the simulation volume" - yes, in a small volume, but it DIVERGED! So the potential now is infinite (or, 10 H which we set it to) somewhere in space where it probably should be zero, or 1 eV, or some other value. Thus it may still cause problems.

Offline Dipankar Saha

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 5
    • View Profile
Re: TB09 meta-GGA
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2015, 15:06 »

Okay...I understand..../ Thank you  Anders for the reply...!!