Author Topic: Graphene Young’s modulus  (Read 3859 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bfazi

  • Guest
Graphene Young’s modulus
« on: October 27, 2016, 11:25 »
Hello,
I have recently calculated the Graphene Young’s modulus, but I got error during the simulation. I sent the error in the following:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "mdtrajectory_graphene.py", line 257, in <module>
    pre_step_hook=strainer,
  File "./zipdir/NL/Dynamics/MolecularDynamics/MolecularDynamics.py", line 185, in MolecularDynamics
  File "./zipdir/NL/Dynamics/Utilities.py", line 749, in checkHookFunction
  File "./zipdir/NL/Dynamics/Utilities.py", line 769, in checkSignature
NL.ComputerScienceUtilities.Exceptions.NLTypeError: The function signature of parameter, pre_step_hook, must take 5 arguments.

My input script has been attached to this post.

Offline Umberto Martinez

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 26
    • View Profile
Re: Graphene Young’s modulus
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2016, 13:11 »
The updated script for 2016 is attached, with diff:
Code
13c13
<     def __call__(self, step, time, configuration, forces, stress):
---
>     def __call__(self, step, time, configuration):
35c35
<         configuration.setBravaisLattice(UnitCell(u1,u2,u3))
---
>         configuration._setBravaisLattice(UnitCell(u1,u2,u3))
48,49d47
< 

Offline Umberto Martinez

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 26
    • View Profile
Re: Graphene Young’s modulus
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2016, 09:43 »
what do you mean by wrong results, did you get an error?
Sure, you need to tune the MD parameters to adapt to your case. since the settings used in the tutorial give good results for a CNT.