Author Topic: Conductance  (Read 5675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cinda

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: tw
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Conductance
« on: July 2, 2012, 07:44 »
Dear all,
I read the manual, and the conductance used the expression G=T(EF)G0. And I know the transmission coefficient is given by T(E,ΔV)=4Tr[Im(∑ll,l)GRl,rIm(∑rr,r)GAr,l]
I calculate the transmission coefficient with no gate voltage and bias voltage, so I can obtain the transmission coefficient at fermi energy. And then I used the G=T(EF)G0 obtain the conductance. But I have questions, if I did not used the voltage, how could T(E,ΔV) obtain? what value is the ΔV set up?
Thanks~

Offline Nordland

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
  • Reputation: 18
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance
« Reply #1 on: July 2, 2012, 13:54 »
If you use the method called conductance() on the TransmissionSpectrum all of this is carried out for you automatically.

Offline cinda

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: tw
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance
« Reply #2 on: July 4, 2012, 05:09 »
I realize that in the method is automatically, but I want to known if there is no gate voltage and bias voltage how did you known the conductance?
Because the conductance is I/V, if we don't apply the voltage where is the conductance come from?

Offline kstokbro

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 392
  • Reputation: 13
    • View Profile
    • QuantumWise
Re: Conductance
« Reply #3 on: July 4, 2012, 12:55 »
It is the linear response conductance, i.e. I/V  in the limit V -> 0

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5538
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 90
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Conductance
« Reply #4 on: July 4, 2012, 15:54 »
... which you can easily prove analytically is T(EF)G0, as you wrote in the beginning, cinda :)

Offline cinda

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: tw
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance
« Reply #5 on: July 5, 2012, 06:27 »
Thank you very much!! I get the point.

Offline PJ

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Conductance
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2013, 11:24 »
can any one explain me how is it possible to get conductance without the application of Voltage and what is the difference between G and G0.

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5538
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 90
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Conductance
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2013, 23:45 »
Conductance is a material parameter, like resistance. You don't need a voltage to have a resistance. Same with conductance.

G is typically the symbol for conductance. G0 is the conductance quantum.