Author Topic: Total energy sign in ATK  (Read 2976 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline simCity

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: ca
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Total energy sign in ATK
« on: October 7, 2013, 13:04 »
I simulated a BN nanotube in ATK. Tried to find the optimum bond length by comparing a few total energies in different simulations. However confused a bit. It might be a simple question but is the bond length with the total energy -12542.8760 eV or -12542.6181 eV better? Which is closer to the lowest energy point? Do I have to compare the absolute values or with the (-) sign? Thanks...

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 96
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Total energy sign in ATK
« Reply #1 on: October 7, 2013, 13:38 »
Lower energy = more negative.

Offline simCity

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: ca
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Total energy sign in ATK
« Reply #2 on: October 7, 2013, 13:53 »
Thanks.