Author Topic: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations  (Read 5700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dhirendra

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 57
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
I  want to calculate the surface energies in a slab simulations. I am referring to this paper  http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4761994 (Figure 2) which uses ATK + Thermodynamics to relate the chemical potential to the surface energy. I am confused with the use of chemical potential there. It corresponds to the Rhodium reservoir. If I simulate the Rhodium bulk in Quantumwise and calculate the chemical potential using the ChemicalPotential function, and the same for the Silicon, then is this ChemicalPotential corresponds to what paper refers to, an energy for the Rhodium reservoir?
The ChemicalPotential what ATK returns is actually a Fermi level.

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2016, 08:41 »
It looks like that paper uses VASP, not ATK. The chemical potential in a bulk is exactly the Fermi level. The Rhodium chemical potential in Eq. 3 is a free variable, and is defined as 0 eV in the bulk.

Offline Umberto Martinez

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 479
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 26
    • View Profile
Re: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2016, 11:10 »
Regarding Schottky-barrier calculations you may want to check out our latest work where, among other things, we compare the slab approach with the device configuration and NEGF approach as implemented in ATK.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04651
Phys. Rev. B 93, 155302 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155302

Offline Dhirendra

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 57
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2016, 12:12 »
Thanks Jess and Umberto,

I think the chemical potential returned by ATK is related to the electrons where as in the surface calculations one needs it for the material. So the chemical potential returned by ATK is irrelevant for the surface energy calculations. And yes the eq 3 of the paper uses it as a variable, so its not calculated from the DFT. Thanks. One of the earlier posts on the forum cleared some concepts for me.

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2016, 08:39 »
OK. Let me just comment on the chemical potential: It is the energy of the highest occupied electronic level, so it always has to do with electrons, no matter what material you are looking at.

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Chemical potential for the surface energy calculations
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2016, 14:40 »
Just to clarify: Jess is explaining what is meant by ChemicalPotential in ATK - here it is always for the electrons. Of course you can talk about the chemical potential of other species, but there is no specific functionality to calculate that in ATK.