When I run the nlpython *.py after installing the ase2009.06.0 according to the installation manual in websit, and displays:
/home/ase0906/atk-2009.06/nlpython/bin/nlpython_exec: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /home/ase0906/atk-2009.06/nlpython/bin/../lib/libpython2.6.so.1.0)
We run the command : cat /proc/version and displays:
cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.9-78.ELsmp (brewbuilder@ls20-bc2-14.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10)) #1 SMP Wed Jul 9 15:46:26 EDT 2008
later, we run : rpm -qa | grep glibc and shows as following:
glibc-2.3.4-2.41
compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.41
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.41
compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
glibc-2.3.4-2.41
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.41
compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30
glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.41
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.103.EL
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.41
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41
finally we download some rpms about glibc 2.4 or advancer version, but remain show:
rpm -ivh glibc-32bit-2.9-3.1.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-32bit-2.9-3.1.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 56b4177a
error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by glibc-32bit-2.9-3.1.x86_64
warning: glibc-2.5-34.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 652e84dc
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.5-34 is needed by glibc-2.5-34.i386
glibc > 2.3.4 conflicts with glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.x86_64
rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.5-34.i386.rpm
warning: glibc-common-2.5-34.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc < 2.5 conflicts with glibc-common-2.5-34.i386
[ase0906@node11 ase0906]$ rpm -ivh glibc-2.5-34.i386.rpm
warning: glibc-2.5-34.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 652e84dc
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.5-34 is needed by glibc-2.5-34.i386
glibc > 2.3.4 conflicts with glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.x86_64
Can you tell me how to deal with successfully?
Additionally, which linux version do you recommend for both atk(2008.10) and ASE(2009.06)?
Is the license of the ASE 2009.06.0 fit for the 2009.06.2?
Thank you very much!!!