Author Topic: Bismuth  (Read 9212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NW

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
  • Country: se
  • Reputation: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Bismuth
« Reply #15 on: March 6, 2018, 18:57 »
Thank you Ulrik.
I am completely confused about this issue ??? ???

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Bismuth
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2018, 16:40 »
I have looked at the reference, and I do not think it is surprising that the structures are a little different. Whether that difference in the structure is important for what you want to model is up to you to decide.

As mentioned above, we introduce some strain into the structure when it is forced to a cubic lattice, and it is probably the relief of that strain you see. If you wish to reproduce exactly the calculations in the paper, you need to construct the nanowire directly from the rhombohedral crystal structure, which is unfortunately currently not possible in VNL.


Offline NW

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
  • Country: se
  • Reputation: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Bismuth
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2018, 21:09 »
Thanks a lot dear Ulirk. Do you think if I construct a BiNW in other software like Material Studio it is possible to continue my calculation in ATK?

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile