Author Topic: Calculate fermi velocity  (Read 21701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline huckelbuckel

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2012, 10:33 »
Lines from A review on silicene—New candidate for electronics

The Fermi velocity calculated by Lew Yan Voon et al.  in graphene, silicene and
germacene are 6.3×105   5.1×105   and  3.8×105 m/s,respectively

Another paper Two- and one-dimensional honeycomb structures of silicon and germanium  S. Cahangirov et. al,

says that Low buckled Si and Ge structures all have Vf of the order of 106 m/sec  very close to graphene!!!


Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5405
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2012, 11:30 »
Then you have to see what is different in their calculation - electronic structure method, GGA/LDA, etc. Maybe they even use tight-binding? All details must be considered.

Offline huckelbuckel

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2012, 13:48 »
Repetaed with GGA-PBE, 41X41X1 k points and DZDP basis

Graphene:   1.785 X 106 m/sec
Germanene :8.7786 X 105 m/sec
Silicene     : 4.1896 X 105 m/sec

slowest in silicene?

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5405
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2012, 21:00 »
Obviously the values are quite sensitive to details - and perhaps also to how the Fermi velocity is computed, which value of epsilon you use. You need to make real sure there is no spurious band gap (because of too small unit cell in C, for instance, or too small k-point sampling). I also know it can be hard to get the exact right buckling in silicene, so this may have an influence.

Offline huckelbuckel

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2012, 07:29 »
i used eps = 0.0001. the 'c' parameter of the hex crystal was kept very large 42.32 Angstroms to avoid inter layer periodic interactions.

Offline Anders Blom

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 5405
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 89
    • View Profile
    • QuantumATK at Synopsys
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #20 on: February 25, 2012, 10:31 »
It would be a good idea to try esp=0.001 as well, even 0.01 and 0.1, to see how linear the dispersion actually is. Also, if you rely upon very small eps, you will want to make sure that the energies are very accurate, which may mean you need to reduce the tolerance of the self-consistent loop.

Offline sonal AGRAWAL

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculate fermi velocity
« Reply #21 on: June 12, 2020, 19:44 »
It's easy :)

K = (1/3,1/3,0) in units of the inverse lattice vectors GA=2pi/a*(1,1/sqrt(3),0) and GB=2pi/a*(1,-1/sqrt(3),0). Hence, K=4pi/3a*(1,1,0) in reciprocal Cartesian.
(We had LaTeX support on the Forum before, I lost it in an update... should bring it back.)

So, K-eps*(1,1,0)=(4pi/3a)*eps*(-1,0,0) and hence dK = 4pi/3a*eps.
Dear sir,
The method given in the above-quoted post  Is the same method i.e. used in the calculate velocity function given in the tutorials of calculation of Fermi velocity in ATK-VNL.
From the tutorial, I am getting the Fermi velocity of silicene and graphene in the 10^5 and 10^6 which is in good agreement in literature but in case of germanene, I am getting only 10^2 m/s. 
Thanks in advance