Author Topic: Hubbard-U Term, Spin Polarization and Geometry Optimization  (Read 4116 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline berna

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 56
  • Country: tr
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Hi.
If we use Hubbard-U parameter (LDA-U, GGA-U) for dft calculation, should dft for  geometry optimization include Hubbard-U parameter?
Similar as above,  if we use spin polarization for dft calculation, should dft for  geometry optimization include  spin polarization?

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hubbard-U Term, Spin Polarization and Geometry Optimization
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2017, 15:00 »
Depends on the system, but one does not in general use DFT-U for geometry optimization. On the contrary, including the spin-polarization in geometry optimization of a ferromagnetic material like iron is crucial.

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Hubbard-U Term, Spin Polarization and Geometry Optimization
« Reply #2 on: December 3, 2017, 06:57 »
1. NO, NO2, and O2 are paramagnetic, should dft for  geometry optimization include spin-polarization?
2. If we calculate heavy elements, should dft for  geometry optimization include spin-polarization?

Offline Daniele Stradi

  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 286
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Hubbard-U Term, Spin Polarization and Geometry Optimization
« Reply #3 on: December 4, 2017, 09:13 »
Yes, in principle the geometry optimization and electronic structure calculation on the optimized geometry should be done at the same level of theory