This was exactly the same challenge I faced when working with graphene, as a comparison to graphite. Virtual NanoLab cannot simply model the periodic system as just 1D or 2D, so you need to trick it into modeling the system as a 3D model. That is why the default crystal for graphene is designed to have the layers so far away that the k-points on the hexagonal face and interior of the Brillouin zone become degenerate.
I would suggest to you the pathway: K - Gamma - M - K - H - A - L - H.
K = 1/3, 1/3, 0
Gamma = 0, 0, 0
M = 0, 1/2, 0
H = 1/3, 1/3, 1/2
A = 0, 0, 1/2
L = 0, 1/2, 1/2
I have attempted to use less than eight k-points in the Energy Bands options, but the program could not display the bands correctly. You will find that the sets K Gamma M and H A L are both the same in every band when inspecting the band structure of graphene. That is a signature of 2D structures, degeneracy of k-points.
Regarding reciprocal space, the k-points used by the EnergyBands algorithm are automatically scaled to the crystal dimensions, so you do not really need to worry about trying to scale them yourself. Reciprocal space is the inverse of the crystal dimension multiplied by factors that give specific vectors and k-point locations.