Author Topic: Nanowire direction  (Read 4269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline karma

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Nanowire direction
« on: December 29, 2017, 11:50 »
how to create nanowires with direction such as [001] & [010]

Offline lknife

  • QuantumATK Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 214
  • Country: us
  • Reputation: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Nanowire direction
« Reply #1 on: January 2, 2018, 02:29 »
Do you know which direction is the [001] or [010] direction? If so, in my opinion, you can make this direction, such as [001] direction, to be the c direction of the nanosheet, by swapping the axis. Then, cut the nanosheet to form a nanowire.

Offline Jess Wellendorff

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Nanowire direction
« Reply #2 on: January 2, 2018, 15:45 »
The Nanowire builder in VNL (Builders -> Nanowire) lets you create nanowires from bulk configurations (e.g. Cu nanowires).

Offline karma

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Nanowire direction
« Reply #3 on: January 3, 2018, 12:10 »
Thank u for your reply sir..... i have to use both the direction that I hv mentioned but since I am using different phases of tio2 to construct the nanowire and also I have to provide surface energy to promote the favourable surface

Offline karma

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: in
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Nanowire direction
« Reply #4 on: January 3, 2018, 12:12 »
 the builder does not provide the option for the directions that I have mentioned

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Nanowire direction
« Reply #5 on: January 8, 2018, 14:54 »
You can add them yourself, by clicking the Add button. However, a Wulff construction might not be a particularly good model if (100) and (001) have very different surface energies.