Author Topic: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1  (Read 3914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pervanem

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: tr
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« on: September 21, 2018, 14:20 »
Hello,
I performed the NEGF calculation (IV-Characteristics)  and transmisionspectrum....
But results are different from each other...default settings are almost same 2018.06 with 2016.4..
Why? which is more accurate?
Can you help me?
 related pictures was attached.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2018, 14:26 by pervanem »

Offline pervanem

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: tr
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2018, 14:23 »
continued

Offline pervanem

  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: tr
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2018, 14:23 »
continued2

Offline Petr Khomyakov

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 25
    • View Profile
Re: 2016.4 vs 2018.06 sp1
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2018, 15:53 »
There are at least two defaults that have been changed: pseudopotential/basis set (FHI/DZP in 2016.4) and electron temperature (300K in 2016.4) .

In 2018, 'Electron temperature' parameter is called 'Broadening' (which is 1000 K in 2018) to reflect the fact that this is not a real electron temperature, but rather a numerical parameter to make SCF convergence smoother with respect to the number of k-points.

In 2018, the default pseudopotential/basis set is pseudoDojo/Medium.