Author Topic: how to calculate the band gap of graphene/mos2 heterostructure correctly  (Read 5608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline njuxyh

  • QuantumATK Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 163
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Hi:
i want to get the correct band gap of graphene/mos2 heterostructure,
one method is to use MGGA, but as the manual said, the c-parameter should test manual because the supercell have big vacuum region, because there are no corresponding bulk graphene/mos2, so the c-parameter can not be determined by known value as the manual said,
so i am wondering how to test the MGGA-c-parameter.
and another question is is there any better to calculate the band gap of such two-dimensional heterostructure in ATK?

THANK YOU VERY MUCH


Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
The best alternatives are probably DFT-1/2 (same computational cost as GGA) and using PW with HSE06 (for reference calculations).

https://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/dft_half_pps/dft_half_pps.html

Offline Petr Khomyakov

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 25
    • View Profile
i want to get the correct band gap of graphene/...
Pristine graphene has a zero gap, which is protected by the symmetry of the graphene lattice - two carbon sublattice are equivalent - and that does not depend on the DFT functional you are using.

Offline njuxyh

  • QuantumATK Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 163
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
i want to get the correct band gap of graphene/...
Pristine graphene has a zero gap, which is protected by the symmetry of the graphene lattice - two carbon sublattice are equivalent - and that does not depend on the DFT functional you are using.

thank you, indeed prinstine graphene is gap-zero, but the MoS2/Graphene is non-zero small gap as many reference menthoned.

so i think it is depending on the the DFT functioanl useing maybe :)