Can we create MTP with dopant atom included?

[Lim changmin]

Hello, I have some questions regarding MTP training with dopant atom attached.

We are planning to put carbon dopant in GeTe amorphous structure with different doping density.

However, since there are no force field related to C, Ge, Te, we decided to create MTP.

Here is the question, to create MTP, as far as I know, making initial training set is essential.

But since there are no initial training set regarding to different carbon doping density in GeTe, I wonder how should we proceed with the first step of creating MTP.

Is there any tips for it?

[Anders Blom]

Step 1 would be to make an MTP for GeTe. This should be relatively straightforward following the standard crystalline training protocol.
Step 2 is to use active learning to extend this MTP to a-GeTe
In step 3 you can then add C to either or both several GeTe crystal supercells and/or selected snapshots from the a-GeTe MD trajectory, and retrain on these. If you need to consider different kinds of C positions (interstitial, substitutional etc) make sure to cover all possibilities.
Finally, I would do a step 4 where you repeat the active learning for a-GeTe with C included.

Now, I am aware that the tutorials for MTP on the website are outdated. We are working on new ones which should be published very soon.

[pshinyeong]

Hello, I am working on the same thing and I have some questions regarding MTP with dopant atom

1. In step 4, you mentioned repeating active learning for a-GeTe with carbon included. Can I skip creating a base MTP with carbon and go directly to active learning after step 3?

2. Before Creating C-doped a-GeTe in step 3, I should use the MTP trained from Step 2 to create amorphous GeTe using Melt Quench method for more accurate a-GeTe?

3. Is it possible to use the defect training protocol with carbon as an interstitial or substitutional dopant in step 1 to skip step 3 altogether?



Thank you in advance for your guidance!

[Anders Blom]

Didn't notice your follow-up question, sorry.
1. I guess you mean after step 2. Yes, that is a possibility for sure, as long as you start the C atom in many different positions.
2. Yes, and this is true whether you skip 3 or not.
3. Probably, as long as you do step 4. The point of 1+2 is that it's a simpler system, and I prefer to build something complex on something simpler.