Author Topic: Born effective charges  (Read 10342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline marmotte

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Country: sa
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Born effective charges
« on: June 10, 2014, 10:15 »
Dear all,

Should the calculated values fulfill the acoustic sum rule \sum_s Z_{s,ij}^*=0 ?

I'm finding a huge number like 6 ? is it a problem of relaxation or strained structure ? I did calculation from the experimental structure.

Thank you

Offline Troels Markussen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Regular QuantumATK user
  • *****
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2014, 16:30 »
Hi,

The acoustic sum rule should ideally be fulfilled. It should be OK to use the experimental structure. I would suggest that you try to decrease the displacement of the atoms (delta_z in the tutorial http://quantumwise.com/documents/tutorials/latest/Polarization/index.html/chap.born.html), if you didn't already try that.

Troels

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2017, 10:46 »
How to get accurate value of born effective charges for 2D materials (e.g. graphene, single layer black phosphorus etc.).  The result was changed with different vacuum spacing.

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2017, 20:57 »
Please provide the python script(s) you have used and a more detailed explanation of what you have tried and how it differed from your expectations.

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2017, 09:57 »
When I changed the value of c in GaN.nc script, the value of BEC was also changed slightly. Besided,  the result of my calculation is different from the previous reports of 3.08-3.23.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2017, 04:16 by Wang Jin »

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2017, 11:19 »
Thanks, I will look into it and get back to you.

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2017, 13:43 »
Unfortunately, our current implementation is only guaranteed to work for orthogonal cells, as stated in this tutorial on polarization: https://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/polarization/polarization.html

I am sorry for any inconvenience this has caused, and I will make sure that we update the manual page to make this clearer.

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2017, 09:22 »
Thank you a lot. Then, I try to turn the lattice into orthogonal cell use surface(cleave) tool, however, the result is also different from the previous reports. Can you help me?

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2017, 13:16 »
I will have a look at the scripts and get back to you.

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2017, 13:18 »
Could you provide the source for the reference numbers you quote, please?

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2017, 04:14 »
[1] Computational discovery of single-layer III-V materials
[2] GaN: From three- to two-dimensional single-layer crystal and its multilayer van der Waals solids

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2017, 10:08 »
Please provide the direct reference or the DOI, so I can find them. The title alone is not adequate for academic papers.

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2017, 04:31 »
 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165415
 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085431

Offline Ulrik G. Vej-Hansen

  • QuantumATK Staff
  • Supreme QuantumATK Wizard
  • *****
  • Posts: 426
  • Country: dk
  • Reputation: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2017, 16:55 »
Thanks, I will take a look at them.

On closer inspection of the script, I have realized that you have simply copied the one from the tutorial directly, without modifying it. Please go back and read through the tutorial in detail, so you understand how the script is created. This should allow you to modify it to suit the 2D system you are interested in.

Offline Kim_W

  • Heavy QuantumATK user
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: cn
  • Reputation: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Born effective charges
« Reply #14 on: November 1, 2017, 03:17 »
The question is: How to set the length of lattice vector in z-direction when calculate the BEC for 2D materials?